The Ambiguous Almighty

The word “ambiguous” not only means doubtful or uncertain; it also denotes something that is open to more than one interpretation or that sends mixed signals. The Almighty is nothing if not ambiguous.

Most religions teach that God is incomprehensible, and then proceed to diagram him/her/it to the nth degree. They claim their sacred books clearly reveal his character and message. What they often ignore or discount are the discrepancies therein.

Take the Bible for instance: It portrays a God who is above mere emotions and yet at times is consumed by them; as when he sends a flood to wipe out humanity, or when he wants to destroy the Israelites in his anger but a more cool-headed Moses talks him out of it.

A God who abhors child sacrifice but orders Abraham to offer Isaac as a test of faith. A God who accepts Jacob’s consecration of a stone pillar at Bethel but later orders the destruction of all such sacred shrines. A God who decrees that children are not to be punished for the sins of their fathers but who requires the death of Achan’s sons and daughters because of his theft.

And then there is the ambiguity between the old and new testaments. The Mosaic code of over 600 laws is given in the former and much of it is discarded in the latter. Divinely instituted dietary rules are dismissed by Jesus as short sighted and unnecessary. Jesus also winks at Sabbath laws, yet Sabbath-breaking occasioned the first use of capital punishment after Sinai.

Especially disconcerting to the Jews was the announcement by Paul and others that the physical descendants of Abraham were being set aside in favor of his spiritual children. And Jerusalem, which God had insisted for centuries was the only place he could be properly worshipped, was now irrelevant as the physical temple was being replaced by a spiritual one. (This was convenient as the Romans sacked Jerusalem and destroyed the temple.)

Progressive revelation and anthropomorphic language exacerbate the confusion, especially in those schools of interpretations that believe every detail is factual, even the contradictory ones.

The church father, Origin, believed the answer was to treat difficult texts as allegorical. He argued that “the glaring anomalies and inconsistencies in scripture forced us to look beyond the literal sense. God had planned these ‘stumbling blocks and interruptions of the historical sense’ to make us look deeper. These ‘impossibilities and incongruities . . . present a barrier to the reader and lead him to refuse to proceed along the pathway of the ordinary meaning.’ *

And then there are the theological mega-issues like divine sovereignty and human free will? If we are predestined to certain ends (heaven or hell), how can our actions possibly matter? But we are taught they do. So, we can’t alter our path but we are responsible for our steps. Hmmm.

If a loving God is not willing that any should perish, how come most of humanity seems destined for the Lake of Fire? But we are taught God’s justice and holiness require him to damn the unrepentant. So, human stubbornness can trump divine desire in the end. Hmmm.

If the creator of the universe holds all things together by the word of his power, how can evil exist without his tacit permission? But we are taught God is not the author of evil and cannot even be touched by it. So, he sustains creation but isn’t culpable for its moral flaws. Hmmm.

Have you ever gone to one of those 3-D movies and not worn the glasses? You can tell what’s happening but it’s out of phase. The details are blurry because you are viewing something that has more dimensions than you are equipped to see. So it is, I believe, with divine revelation. We see in a glass darkly, which should make us less dogmatic with our opinions and more humble in our attitude toward others.

 * The Case for God by Karen Armstrong, page 95.


3 thoughts on “The Ambiguous Almighty

  1. Mike I totally understand about the 3d glasses.
    Most of my life lately seems like my glasses have been taken away and I don’t know why or what to do about it.

    All of a sudden recently my unemployment disapeared with no announcement in advance from Alaska. They have been telling me that Alaska doesn’t have a tier system and I wouldn’t have to worry about my unemployment running out for several years.

    I have my health (although my body constantly hurts and i’m tired since my stint in the hospital) but I’m about to lose my car. My C-PAP machine has broken down and I could have a stroke or a heart attack without it. Every day I wake up surprised. Just the mask alone for my machine costs over 1200.

    I have put out over 200 resumes since my unemployment died 3 weeks ago.

    Teresa and I have been able to keep her at home and homeschool Jonny and keep him away from the garbage in public schools. (They are now giving condoms to children as early as 5 with no warning to parents or the ability to optout in Portland Public schoools.)

    But in order to keep our car we are going to both have to go down to welfare and sit there for 8 hours a day and learn things we already know. The Welfare system hasn’t been changed for professionals who are trying to get a job but can’t it’s designed for people that have never had a job or don’t want one.

    I’m left with these 2d glasses jammed onto my face not understanding why God is doing what he’s doing or more confusing not doing to help my family.

    I’m wishing desperately for 3d glasses, or at least a whisper in my ear from God to help me understand.

    God bless you Mike and Susan et al.

    1. Obviously I have no answers or explanations for what you are going through. Life happens and we try to make sense of it, which is next to impossible sometimes. I find it hard some days to have “faith” in God but I choose to have “hope” in God and in a future time when all will be well and the past will be put into perspective.

      Until then I pray for a sense of divine presence and daily grace, the latter being much easier to perceive.

  2. Mike, what is your point? I found this post to be engrossing, as are all your posts, but I found myself lost in this one. Are you saying that His ambiguity should lead us to be enraptured by His depth of character? Wouldn’t it make more sense to see all the contrary writings as indicators of different authorship? Or possibly, that God is totally schizophrenic? Wouldn’t the uncertainty of God make us more uncertain about everything? Just a thought. Ken

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s